Más Información

Defensa podrá cancelar licencias de portación de armas, determina la Corte; argumenta que es por seguridad pública
"Estás viendo tormenta, hijito, y no te hincas"; Ricardo Monreal le pide a su hermano Saúl desistir de la gubernatura de Zacatecas

Designan a Rosaura Martínez Ruíz nueva integrante de la Junta de Gobierno de la UNAM; es hija de la secretaria de Ciencias

Captan en video a regidora de Ocotlán cargando y manoteando a mono araña; Profepa presenta denuncia penal por posesión ilegal

“Ya bájale de hue..."; levantan y agreden al periodista Epifanio López en Chiapas; pide medidas de protección
By Pierre-Marc René and Adriana Varillas
“There was no ecocide in Tajamar, neither environmental devastation”, said Guillermo Haro, head of the Environmental Protection Agency (Profepa) referring to the project Malecón Cancún Tajamar, for which a mangrove swamp was recently destroyed.
However he admitted that even though environmental rules were respected for the first stages of the project, the owners should have requested a new authorization for the third stage, in accordance with the new regulations in force.
He added that the photos of dead animals shown on social networks are not real, because some of those animals were found in Philippines years ago while another was found dead in Cozumel months ago.
Alejandra Serrano, coordinator of the southeast office of the Mexican Center of Environmental Law (CEMDA), said that if the law had been correctly applied, it would have been impossible to approve the project, as it happened in July 2005.
She added that at least two norms (NOM 05 and 022), as well as the Agreement for the Ecological Protection of Nichupté, were violated when the Tajamar project was evaluated.
Noticias según tus intereses
[Publicidad]
[Publicidad]









